ANTIFA, PORTLAND, AND WHY THE COMMUCRATS PUSH GUN CONTROL
Updated: Mar 1
The Commucrats’ push for gun control and the continuous assault on our 2nd amendment is not about saving human lives like they falsely claim.
Most Democrats support abortion which is murder. Abortion was the leading cause of death in 2018 with over 41 million killed. Only about 40,000 die from all types of gunshot wounds per year and many of those are suicides. So one hundred times more people are dying from abortion than gun deaths.
Christians are being murdered around the world by Muslims and the Commucrats admit "some people got killed, so? Don't be Islamophobic."
Commucrats take in millions and millions of sharia-compliant dollars. Commucrats don't seem to mind when Christians get killed because Christians are a big part of America they want to destroy.
The Commucrats didn't say a word.
Eric Holder and Obama's Operation Fast and Furious-supplied guns to Mexican cartels. People were killed by Holder and Obama's master plan, including at least one DEA agent. Obama continued six wars, and even escalated the war in Afghanistan, by increasing troops by 300%. It became known as "Obama's War." Not a peep from the Commucrats.
Obama droned-killed like he was playing a video game as a disgruntled teenager on too much caffeine. Some American citizens abroad, without any hint of due process or trial, died by targeted drone attacks.
However, if an American wants to execute their 2nd amendment right and own a gun, the Commucrats go berserk and point to a handful of mass shootings by wackos, or black-on-black or Hispanic-on-Hispanic gang violence to not let hundreds of millions own a gun at all in an increasingly violent America. They don't mention the heavily armed and violence and crime-ridden "No-Go-Zones" that their Islamic mega-donors establish around the world. They don't mention these zones because it's part of their plan for Anarchy and Jihad.
If we assume that they don't care about human life, then we have to assume that they don't want us Americans to own guns for other reasons.
One obvious reason for a push for no guns is that a defenseless population cannot stand up to tyranny.
Using mass immigration to boost voting power and bring in more obedient slaves, within the context of a total Civilization Jihad, a progression towards tyranny anchors the grand Democratic Deception.
Tyranny is a totalitarian, fascist, and oppressive "politically correct" but "civil rights are but a dream" type of government. There is a ruling class or dictator that runs everything, tells everybody what to do, and not to do, and this keeps the rulers in power. It's like an Obama surrounded by a billion Antifa. They take most of the wealth. They intentionally keep the masses weak, hungry, and defenseless without arms, while running state media to brainwash the population and censor the truth.
Rulers might be: Kings and Queens, a Hitler, a Putin, a Mussolini, a Nicolás Maduro, a group of Socialist Democrats, a Caliphate, or a Fascist Transnational Deep State Regime like we had (have) with puppet Obama, the Marxist Islamo-Communist
The history of strict gun control is as long as the history of tyranny.
Historian Stephen Halbrook strived to offer us the first presentation claiming that Hitler applied gun control to make the Jewish people of Germany and his other political opponents defenseless.
Hitler stated that permitting “subject races” marked for extermination would be a mistake only fools would make. Wayne LaPierre, of the National Rifle Association, confirmed when he stated that he believed Nazi policies and laws enabled the Holocaust by reducing risk for resistance.
These historical facts about Hitler implementing gun control against the Jews and other groups provide one basis for 2nd Amendment rights serving as part of "security against tyranny.” Other historical genocides have served to support the same argument, for example, with the genocide by Pol Pot and the Khmer Rough.
One can also make the argument that our government tried to shut down our militias to reduce our ability to resist tyranny.
So don't be fooled when the Commucrats jump on any headline that includes guns, or gunshots in the night, or a boy that fired a cap-gun, and start ranting about stricter gun control.
Chicago has some of the strictest gun control laws but one of the highest murder rates. Only about 26% of murderers in Chicago get caught compared to about a 60% rate for the rest of the nation. Why? Democrat "Alternative Justice" installed by the Communist regime of Obama, George Soros, Kamala Harris, Rahm Emmanuel, and Kim Foxx among others.
The Commucrats want the Commucrats to be the only ones with guns.
I covered alternative justice and how it relates to Antifa in detail in my book, LIES, about Jussie Smollett, because this is how Jussie Smollett got off so easily at the whim of a single prosecutor. Alternative justice means the all-powerful prosecutors earn extra fees and the criminals that fit the Democratic Deep State agenda walk free.
We caught the Communist regime in Chicago red-handed. ( pun intended). That's one reason the Jussie Smollett story is so important.
The Commucrats want anarchy in the streets and terrified citizens to be unprotected in a violent crime-ridden society. They can shut down the streets anytime with Antifa with their assault gloves and their quick-dry cement milkshakes. The Commucrats want people to be scared and to think they need even more government legislation and spending that won't solve the problem, but only make the people poorer and with fewer rights.
ENTER THE GOONIES
Conservative journalist and Twitter warrior Andy Ngo found himself under assault by no less than 12 Antifa in Portland in June of 2019. After punches to the head with assault gloves, quick-drying cement milkshakes were thrown with impunity, and multiple kicks, and he was taken to the hospital and found to have a brain bleed.
Historically, fascist goon squads enforce tyranny. It was the "Black Shirts" for Communist Mussolini. It was the "Brown Shirts" for Fascist Hitler. Now it is the black garb and masks of Antifa, standard double-speak lies for "anti-fascist" Hint: the ones beating people up for expressing an opposing opinion, even on how to tie one's shoes, are the fascists.
Antifa arose from the Jewish Soviet Communists in the 1920s and had cells in Germany to try and establish a communist dictatorship through violence.
Many Antifa members are also satanists, communists, and members of the Democratic Socialists of America, 50,000 strong. Antifa are the henchmen for the Squad and people like Bernie Sanders, Nancy Pelosi, Charles Schumer, Maxine Waters Jerry Nadler, and Keith Ellison
Today, they have thousands of cells in the EU and the USA and other countries.
In a city like Chicago, Antifa members don't have to worry about getting prosecuted for assault. Soros and his "globalist" fascist/communist team are setting this up in other cities in California and Oregon, for example, Portland, to be ready for a bloody 2020 election.
Soros has been accused of hijacking Black Lives Matter and funding activist groups Media Matters for America, MoveOn.org, and the Tides Foundation to promote a socialist, collectivist and anti-white capitalism agenda.
One of his goals is to widen racial divides and to create social anarchy through buying and exploiting district attorneys and their alternative justice programs. Soros pays protesters and some commit assault but are not charged or their charges are dropped through alternative justice through district attorneys he funded for their campaigns.
Soros's goal is to bribe his way into the justice system in selected municipalities where he can create riots in the streets and work to take down America from the inside out in favor of globalism. Globalist syndicates put elites like the EU leaders and the Commucrat Deep State in charge. Soros has been putting big money into district attorneys since he hijacked Black Lives Matter, including those in Alameda County, San Diego, and Oregon.
To show the extent of the alternative justice or anarchist movement, in Berkeley, California, which is in Alameda County, in August of 2018, police tweeted names, photos taken during bookings, and charges for 15 protesters in two events. Charges included carrying weapons that had been banned, battery on a police officer, resisting arrest, and disturbing the peace. Four, only four, out of 15 were ever charged and all of their cases were dismissed in court.
So next time you see a post by a Democrat whining about stricter gun control using some convoluted reasoning, or claiming Antifa is justified in its violence, post this link to this article:
to put them in their place as lying traitors to the American dream.
And make sure you have a gun, and know how to use it, and keep it safely according to law.
"WELCOME TO THE WHITE HAT REVOLUTION, BROTHERS AND SISTERS"
Support me and more research like this by reading my books and blog.
August 17, 2019
"The author is convincing that the mistreatment and persecution of Christians around the world is part of an effort between organizations that work in many different countries at the same time. The main example is the Muslim Brotherhood that works along with communist organizations to push their ideas and policies on others in schools and churches and everywhere they can. They try to deny Christianity everywhere saying you must have a separation between church and state but then figure out ways to put Islam into the curriculum. the author shows that this is part of a democratic transnational Deep State. these people want to destroy Christianity because it represents a strong family. They want to destroy the strong family so and Islamic or communist state can take over. The book shows how the Deep States operate and explains them very well. The author makes it clear that people alone are not capable of running governments because of their nature. They become dishonest or corrupt. The solution is a hybrid between people and artificial intelligence, like that used by some big corporations and by the country of Estonia. In this way, corruption could be stopped and we could get a handle on the misuse of money by the government.
I have never read a book like this that ties together so many subjects so well. I feel like I understand the world much better now and especially how governments operate in the shadows. Now when I watch the Daily News, I can see why people are saying what they're saying. They in the news media are often lying. Politics seems like a competition to get its office to see who can steal the money. The author points out that the technology is already here to instigate a digital government but it's a matter of resistance from the people in control. He cites the example of the country of Estonia when 99% of the government is computerized and the country runs very smoothly with a very small rate of corruption."
Includes how to stop corruption and violence using Digital Govt.
Michaud, Jon (April 19, 2012). "The Birth of the Modern Gun Debate". The New Yorker.
Bugliosi, Vincent (2007). Reclaiming History: The Assassination of John F. Kennedy. W.W. Norton & Co. p. 200. ISBN 978-0-393-04525-3.
Rosenfeld, Steven (January 14, 2013). "The NRA once supported gun control". Salon. Salon Media Group. Retrieved July 7, 2014.
Davidson, Osha Gray (1998). Under Fire: The NRA and the Battle for Gun Control. University of Iowa Press. p. 30. ISBN 978-1-58729-042-8.
"Sources for Connecticut's role in the gun control debate". University of Connecticut. 2014. Archived from the original on July 7, 2014. Retrieved July 7, 2014.
"Common Sense". Retrieved 10 June 2016.
Finney, John W. (June 12, 1968). "Gun Control Bill Blocked In House; Panel Deadlocks on Johnson Plan to Curb Rifle Sales – New Vote Is Scheduled". New York Times. p. 1.(subscription required)
Finney, John W. (June 21, 1968). "Senate Due To Act Today; House Unit Votes Gun Bill, But Senate Panel Delays It House Committee Vote". New York Times. p. 1.(subscription required)
Johnson, Lyndon B. (October 22, 1968). "553 – Remarks Upon Signing the Gun Control Act of 1968". presidency.ucsb.edu. Online by Gerhard Peters and John T. Woolley, The American Presidency Project.
Dolak, Kevin (November 21, 2013). "Gun Debate Spurred by Kennedy Assassination Rages on Today". ABC News Internet Ventures. Retrieved July 7, 2014.
"U.S. gun control: A history of tragedy, legislative action". CBS Interactive. April 13, 2013. Retrieved July 7, 2014.
Herbert, Arthur (September 26, 2011). "Open Letter to All Federal Firearms Licensees" (PDF). atf.gov. U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives. Archived from the original (PDF) on February 16, 2013.
"18 U.S. Code § 922 – Unlawful acts". law.cornell.edu. Legal Information Institute (LII).
"Federal Firearms Regulations Reference Guide 2005" (PDF). 2005. Archived from the original (PDF) on December 31, 2009.
"Defining the type of weapon under review, The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2008-09-20. Retrieved 2007-05-10.
"Department of the Treasury Study on the Sporting Suitability of Modified Semiautomatic Assault Rifles" (PDF). atf.gov. April 1998.
Knox, Neal (2009) . "The Dodd Bill Both Fact ... and Fantasy". In Knox, Chris (ed.). The Gun Rights War: Dispatches from the Front Lines. MacFarlane. ISBN 9780976863304.
Waldman, Michael (2014). The Second Amendment: A Biography. Simon and Schuster. ISBN 978-1-4767-4746-0.
Achenbach, Joel; Higham, Scott; Horwitz, Sari (12 January 2013). "How NRA's true believers converted a marksmanship group into a mighty gun lobby". The Washington Post. Retrieved 6 July 2014.
Knox, Neal (2009) . "JPFO Proves Me Wrong". In Knox, Chris (ed.). The Gun Rights War: Dispatches from the Front Lines. MacFarlane. ISBN 9780976863304. OCLC 423586835.
Winkler, Adam (2011). Gunfight: The Battle Over the Right to Bear Arms in America. Norton. ISBN 9780393077414.
Norell, James O. E. (2011). "Passing of a Legend". nrapublications.org. National Rifle Association. Archived from the original on May 6, 2012. Retrieved July 5, 2014.
Spitzer, Robert J. (2011). "Gun Control: Constitutional Mandate or Myth?". In Tatalovich, Raymond; Daynes, Byron W. (eds.). Moral Controversies in American Politics. M.E. Sharpe. p. 175. ISBN 9780765627452.
Spitzer, Robert J. (2011). "Gun Control: Constitutional Mandate or Myth?". In Tatalovich, Raymond; Daynes, Byron W. (eds.). Moral Controversies in American Politics. M.E. Sharpe. p. 176. ISBN 9780765627452.